Tally List : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis
click for archive home
 
Archive of:
Imail Forum
Ipswitch list for Imail
 
home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates
 
all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback


Search the Tallylist search by keyword:

About Imail :
product's home
product's list home
 
  Archived TallyList / Imail Forum: 
Subject: RE: HEADER QUESTION
Sanford Whiteman (51p/+1r)     Posted: Thursday 26 Oct 2000
This post: 24 views, +0 rating

Word up.

> -----Original Message----- > From: IMail_Forum-owner@list.ipswitch.com > [mailto:IMail_Forum-owner@list.ipswitch.com]On Behalf Of NetQuick Mail > Administration > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 7:51 PM > To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] HEADER QUESTION > > > Gentlemen If I might intercede. > > The RFCs says what the standards are and are not. I fail > to see where > there is any implication as to trust or security. The RFCs is but a > standard. Email headers at their inception may have been > intended as a > trust worthy, but unfortunately they have been forged, > hacked, and abused > beyond anything foreseeable when the RFCs were initially written. > > Since then they have become unreliable and due to the > inseption of the > black list by the Unix mafia, a hazard to any mail server > that uses them to > validate senders. Any server relying on them, if found out, > will shortly > have John and Bobby Kennedy spamming away along with Jimmy > Hoffa. Shortly > there after they will come to the attention of one or the other of the > non-govermental Email vigilanties and be added to their > database of open > relay/blocked servers. After that it will only be a short > while before > their server becomes a meer electronic paperweight on the WWW. > > Like it or not that is the way of the world wide web. It > ain't right > but it is reality. > > Now can we move on to something more productive before I > go into another > rant? > > Kevin Childers > > > > > >


Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (25 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (23 v/ +0 r)
Re: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (19 v/ +0 r)
Re: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (21 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000 (this post)   (24 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (24 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (17 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (17 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (16 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (21 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (24 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (28 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (19 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (29 v/ +0 r)
FW: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (21 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  26 Oct 2000   (23 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  25 Oct 2000   (21 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  25 Oct 2000   (19 v/ +0 r)
RE: HEADER QUESTION  25 Oct 2000   (27 v/ +0 r)
HEADER QUESTION  24 Oct 2000   (22 v/ +0 r)
 

Send a reply to the Imail Forum list!
click to send a reply! NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)

Feedback: If this post was exceptionally helpful, please help by giving this post a positive review.

 

TallyList : copyright Ububik - 2000