We also block the null senders to stop the spamming. But it also stops the return receipt with Outlook. If anyone knows away around this please let me know.
Arthur Donchey, CISSP
V.P.Griffen & Assoc. L.L.C. http://www.vpga.com adonchey@vpga.com
Skyline Internet Inc. http://www.skylineinternet.com adonchey@skylineinternet.com
-----Original Message----- From: IMail_Forum-owner@list.ipswitch.com [mailto:IMail_Forum-owner@list.ipswitch.com]On Behalf Of PC Tech Sent: Saturday, 12 May 2001 11:15 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Time to fix "Refuse NULL <> Senders" option!
I have null senders blocked at my mail server. About 80% of the spam I get has null senders. This keeps me from receiving them. RFC compliant or not, it is staying the way it is on my server. Go ahead and block me if you must.
# -----Original Message----- # From: IMail_Forum-owner@list.ipswitch.com # [mailto:IMail_Forum-owner@list.ipswitch.com]On Behalf Of Scott Perry # Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 4:00 PM # To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com # Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Time to fix "Refuse NULL <> Senders" option! # # # > Thanks for the heads up. In my opinion they are going about this all # > wrong. What they should fix is bounced messages being sent null # > sender <>. That is rude. # # Actually, the RFCs require that the bounce messages to be sent # that way. It's to help minimize the chance of mail loops. # # # -- # -Scott # # Declude: Anti-virus and Anti-spam solutions for IMail. http://www.declude.com --