> The same parts were missing both times, but there is nothing special about the parts.
Since it is the same parts that are missing, that helps rule out a lot of things (such as networking issues).
If I were you, I would look at the IMail .MBX file, and see if there are any clues in there.
The example you showed was cut off at 250 characters. 250 characters sounds like a semi-logical cutoff; it may be that lines longer than 250 characters are automatically getting cut. That would explain why it always happens in the same place, and why it might happen more often at the end of paragraphs (which are often sent all on one line, or split into 1000-byte lengths).
If the 250 character truncation proves to be correct, the next step is identifying who is doing it. I haven't heard of IMail doing that (and no E-mail software should truncate lines less than 1000 bytes), but if it is getting to the non-IMail account, one has to wonder. I'm guessing that the original message as it exists in the .MBX file may give us some clues. -Scott
Declude: Anti-spam and Anti-virus solutions for IMail. http://www.declude.com