Archive of:
Imail Forum
Ipswitch list for Imail
home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates
all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback
About Imail :
product's home
product's list home
|
|
Archived TallyList / Imail Forum:
Subject: Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II
Daniel Donnelly (1515p/+0r) Posted: Thursday 28 Dec 2000 This post: 26 views, +0 rating
I just picked one of AOLs MX servers and attempted a message delivery and it accepted the email address of anyone@aol.com. I kind of doubt that is a real username, so this makes me think that their servers are setup to accept any username. That being the case, the servers would have to deliver or return, so at least one of those is 'MIA'.
Is still wonder if those having problems are just not getting a 'bounce' (giving the reason for the failure to deliver) because 'Refuse Null Sender' is turned on?? Of course, that would not explain why one server can deliver email and be seen in the user account, and another can deliver, but not be seen, in the same user account. That does sound more like a rule/filter/blackhole of some kind.
Daniel Donnelly _______________________________________________________
----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Donnelly" <tech_ddd@ipswitch.com> To: <IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 3:24 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] iMail Server to AOL, part II
> Len, > > Well, I do and don't agree, too. It is strange that one server can and > another cannot, but if each show that an AOL server accepted the message, it > 'should' take all responsibility for delivery or return. It is certainly > possible for a SMPT server to accept messages, then just chuck them (Rules > in IMail can do this, as we know) into the bit bucket. I guess we are both > saying the same thing 'Why does one servers messages get delivered to the > client mailbox, but not the others?'. That is why I asked for logs from both > servers, to make a comparison as to the route each is taking, could be a > clue. > > All this tells me is that we don't know the answer as yet and we have not > asked the right questions, or we have not gotten correct answers (from > AOL?). A piece of the puzzle is still missing and once found, it will all > make sense. > > Happy Holidays! > > Daniel Donnelly > ________________________________________________________ > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Len Conrad" <LConrad@Go2France.com> > To: <IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 2:41 PM > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] iMail Server to AOL, part II > > > > > > >It also means that whatever it is, is at AOL's end. > > > > Well, not for sure, not when he can relay his mail through other > > servers with the same mail from and rcpt to: and have it delivered. > > > > >IMail did deliver and AOL accepted, so it becomes their > > >responsibility to deliver or return. > > > > I agree in theory and according to RFC, but there's something weird > > going on when his relay trick is succeeding where Imail isn't. > > > > Len > > > > > > > > http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : Binary for ISC BIND 8.2.3 T9B for NT4 & W2K > > http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 29 Dec 2000 |
(20 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 29 Dec 2000 |
(25 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 29 Dec 2000 |
(19 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 29 Dec 2000 |
(19 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part III Now What? | 29 Dec 2000 |
(20 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 29 Dec 2000 |
(27 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 29 Dec 2000 |
(22 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part III Now What? | 28 Dec 2000 |
(26 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(19 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(26 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(25 v/ +0 r) |
| RE: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(24 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(20 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(30 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(19 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(27 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 (this post) |
(26 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(27 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(27 v/ +0 r) |
| RE: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(40 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(23 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(26 v/ +0 r) |
| RE: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(26 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(25 v/ +0 r) |
| Re: iMail Server to AOL, part II | 28 Dec 2000 |
(22 v/ +0 r) |
| Send a reply to the Imail Forum list! |
 |
NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!) |
|