Tally List : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis
click for archive home
 
Archive of:
Imail Forum
Ipswitch list for Imail
 
home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates
 
all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback


Search the Tallylist search by keyword:

About Imail :
product's home
product's list home
 
  Archived TallyList / Imail Forum: 
Subject: RE: Effciency of IMail
Anthony Abby (28p/+0r)     Posted: Monday 16 Oct 2000
This post: 27 views, +0 rating

Well Matt, I don;t even have that.. We've been using a single Pentium 1 200 with 96mb dram for the past two years and it's served us well enough until now. I just upgraded to IMail 6.04 (with the patch also) in addition to adding seven additional busy lists over the weekend, so I'm not entirely sure if it;s the list traffic or the upgrade... anyway, IMail simply can not keep up with the amount of traffic my lists are pumping into the que.... to be real honest those seven new lists don;t have all that many subscribers so I would have a hard time believing that by themselves they brought my mail server crawling on its knees... but the end result is that mail is sitting in my que from 45-60 or so minutes before it goes out now.... it never used to take that long. it never used to take more than a few minutes at most for something to get out....

I wished there were an easy way to see the stats on IMail and see how my system was holding up under constant strain....

Anthony

> Not that I am awaer of.. > > However we had a dual PII-300 256megs of memory that started seeing your > problems when it filled 2 T1's bi-directional with JUST MAIL traffic.. > > (we happen to have a ton of engineers who e-mail to a list where an 80Meg > file gets sent to 30-40other engineers at one time.) > > --matt


Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)
RE: Effciency of IMail  16 Oct 2000   (47 v/ +0 r)
RE: Effciency of IMail  16 Oct 2000   (21 v/ +0 r)
RE: Effciency of IMail  16 Oct 2000   (27 v/ +0 r)
RE: Effciency of IMail  16 Oct 2000   (24 v/ +0 r)
RE: Effciency of IMail  16 Oct 2000 (this post)   (27 v/ +0 r)
RE: Effciency of IMail  16 Oct 2000   (25 v/ +0 r)
Re: Effciency of IMail  16 Oct 2000   (22 v/ +0 r)
Effciency of IMail  16 Oct 2000   (30 v/ +0 r)
 

Send a reply to the Imail Forum list!
click to send a reply! NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)

Feedback: If this post was exceptionally helpful, please help by giving this post a positive review.

 

TallyList : copyright Ububik - 2000