Tally List : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis
click for archive home
 
Archive of:
Authorware
MacroMedia AuthorWare
 
home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates
 
all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback


Search the Tallylist search by keyword:

About Authorware :
product's home
product's list home
 
  Archived TallyList / Authorware: 
Subject: Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of)
George Hawrysch (17p/+0r)     Posted: Monday 07 May 2001
This post: 62 views, +0 rating

Yes, several hundred dollars more. More importantly, it's larger than than what airlines permit for carry-on luggage, where the 17" is just under regulation size. Otherwise I would definitely deal with this by going with 18".

G.H.

On Mon, 7 May 2001, Russell, Robert wrote:

> Is there a big price difference between the 17" and 18"? You said the 18" > didn't have that problem... > > Bob > ******************************************* > Robert R. Russell (bob.russell@alleni.com) > Interactivity Architect - Studio T > ALLEN INTERACTIONS INC., Minneapolis MN USA > 952/995-9680 * We're "Engaging the Mind" > with Wonderful Interactive Multimedia > ******************************************* > > > -----Original Message----- > From: George Hawrysch [mailto:zolotar@INTERLOG.COM] > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 3:28 PM > To: AWARE@LISTSERV.CC.KULEUVEN.AC.BE > Subject: Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of) > > > >George I was wondering when you posted about this last week if the > monitors > >you have found are perhaps aimed at the television market?? > > They are marketed as computer display units, in one case forming part of > a complete package. No mention of television. I did try routing a TV > signal through this one: awesome. If you play games, surf websites and > such, it's a wonderful monitor. But if you work with graphics as such, > they will be distorted, all the time. I'm amazed that something like > this would find its way to market at all as a general-purpose display > device. > > > >I ask because the company I used to work of for had video/TV roots, and > all > >major graphics work was done on broadcast equipment (HAL was one machine, > I > >forget the other right now...). These used TV (UK spec PAL? NTSC? > Whatever > >you guys un the US don't use <g>) These had a display resolution of > 576x768 > >... or 4:5 against a standard PC resolution of 4:3. Or 1.25 v's 1.333333 > >using your own notation. They also had rectangular pixels. > > > >Sort of adds up don't you think? > > It does. The numbers you mention are almost exactly the ones I found. > The guy from NEC did say that the actual displays were made by several > different > suppliers. But I still don't see how a monitor that distorts simple > shapes all the time as a direct result of its physical construction can be > sold at all for any purpose. It's a mystery... > > George Hawrysch > > -- > Search the Archives -- UPDATED EVERY DAY!! > http://www.e-media.nl/aware/search.html > > The AWARE List > http://www.e-media.nl/aware/index.html > > Netiquette: > !! Use descriptive subject fields > !! Delete all unneeded lines from your reply > > > - Use subject prefixes (A5 , A5Mac , A5Web , KO , UCD , OT) >

-- Search the Archives -- UPDATED EVERY DAY!! http://www.e-media.nl/aware/search.html

The AWARE List http://www.e-media.nl/aware/index.html

Netiquette: !! Use descriptive subject fields !! Delete all unneeded lines from your reply

- Use subject prefixes (A5 , A5Mac , A5Web , KO , UCD , OT)


Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)
Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of)  07 May 2001 (this post)   (62 v/ +0 r)
Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of)  07 May 2001   (47 v/ +0 r)
Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of)  07 May 2001   (41 v/ +0 r)
Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of)  07 May 2001   (38 v/ +0 r)
Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of)  07 May 2001   (46 v/ +0 r)
Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of)  07 May 2001   (42 v/ +0 r)
Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of)  07 May 2001   (62 v/ +0 r)
Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of)  07 May 2001   (59 v/ +0 r)
Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of)  07 May 2001   (42 v/ +0 r)
Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of)  07 May 2001   (42 v/ +0 r)
Re: LCD aspect ratio : Solution (sort of)  07 May 2001   (46 v/ +0 r)
 

Send a reply to the Authorware list!
click to send a reply! NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)

Feedback: If this post was exceptionally helpful, please help by giving this post a positive review.

 

TallyList : copyright Ububik - 2000