> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Briscoe [mailto:Tom.Briscoe@compassbnk.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:03 PM > To: Fusebox > Subject: Re: Building sites by Page ID vs. Page Files > > > You're right. There would have been a fuseaction included in > my example in a Fusebox site. > > My point is to investigate the advantages of building a site > file-by-file vs. a pageID method. In the first case, you'd > create multiple "dsp" files and a fuseaction for each page of > content. In the latter case, you'd have a single fuseaction > which would also be passed a pageID. > > However, I think it's a relevant subject to web development > in general outside of Fusebox specifically. My apologies for > being a bit OT. : ) > > I'd ask the list if they've favored one method or the other and why? > > Briscoe > > >>> "stas" <stas@newdel.net> 04/19/01 01:04PM >>> > I am not sure I understand your point. Fusebox would deal > with that like > this - index.cfm?fuseaction=showpage&pageid=52 , no? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Briscoe" <Tom.Briscoe@compassbnk.com> > > Aside from development time and server overhead, what > disadvantages would a > pageID site building method have vs. file based? > > Thoughts? Opinions? Any personal experiences? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists