Tally List : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis
click for archive home
 
Archive of:
Fusebox
Cold Fusion Fuse Box List
 
home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates
 
all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback


Search the Tallylist search by keyword:

About CF Fusebox Methods :
product's home
product's list home
 
  Archived TallyList / Fusebox: 
Subject: RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info
Jeff Peters (38p/+0r)     Posted: Monday 30 Apr 2001
This post: 62 views, +0 rating

Don't hold your breath. TagServlet's stated design intent does not include full language compliance, according to their FAQ.

- Jeff

On 30 Apr 2001, at 14:15, David Sparkman wrote:

> Time for everyone to take a good long look at TagServlet. Hopefully, they > will get full language compliance in the next 6 months or so. > > http://www.tagservlet.com > > Thanks, > David Sparkman > Director of Technology > Weberize > http://www.weberize.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave McKenna [mailto:Dave.McKenna@MurrayState.edu] > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 1:24 PM > To: Fusebox > Subject: RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info > > > > How is Macromedia going to define "application"? Will multiple > > applications > > be defined by multiple <cfapplication> tags, multiple directories, what? > > What constitutes a single application? This seems like a very subjective > > qualifier to me. Will they distinguish between internet and intranet? So > > many questions... > > Yes, this is deeply concerning. I have multiple servers (non-clustered), > each with multiple applications (as defined by the CFAPPLICATION tag) > running concurrently. If we have to start paying based on the number of > times we use the CFAPPLICATION tag, as well as by the number of processors > and the number of servers, we WILL drop CF like a rock. And we've been > using it since v. 2, so all the usual "we helped BUILD you guys" stuff > applies. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists


Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  30 Apr 2001 (this post)   (62 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  30 Apr 2001   (51 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  28 Apr 2001   (58 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (43 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (40 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (46 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (58 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (44 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (50 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (59 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (49 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (50 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (54 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (61 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info - repost  27 Apr 2001   (47 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (66 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (49 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (57 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (50 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (50 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (51 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (47 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  27 Apr 2001   (45 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  26 Apr 2001   (53 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion 5.0 Info  26 Apr 2001   (47 v/ +0 r)
 

Send a reply to the Fusebox list!
click to send a reply! NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)

Feedback: If this post was exceptionally helpful, please help by giving this post a positive review.

 

TallyList : copyright Ububik - 2000