The major benefit is that circuit applications can be developed and called as separate entities, but can then be plugged-in to a higher-level application, and inherit the higher-level app's environment.

There, that's about it in a single sentence. Maybe Hal would describe it better.

Anyway, enjoy it. It has some intriguing possibilities.

Lee Bjork Borkman

-----Original Message----- From: Jason Glaun [mailto:Jason.Glaun@mourant.com]

I am not yet using the XFB architecture and would like to get into it. I am just having a look at Hal's example and was wondering if anyone could tell me the advantages XFB has over the traditional fusebox architecture.

Thanks

Website: http://www.mourant.com

The information in this email is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately at the above E-mail address or telephone +44 1534 609000

We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

If this message includes attachments, please ensure they are opened within the relevant application to ensure full receipt. If you experience difficulties, please refer back to the sender. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists