Tally List : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis
click for archive home
 
Archive of:
Fusebox
Cold Fusion Fuse Box List
 
home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates
 
all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback


Search the Tallylist search by keyword:

About CF Fusebox Methods :
product's home
product's list home
 
  Archived TallyList / Fusebox: 
Subject: RE: RE: Managing program flow
BORKMAN Lee (83p/+0r)     Posted: Wednesday 02 May 2001
This post: 54 views, +0 rating

My apologies, I think I came into that discussion a little late, and didn't quite realise exactly what the issue was.

Sorry about that, Lee.

-----Original Message----- From: BORKMAN Lee [mailto:lee_Borkman@rta.nsw.gov.au] Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2001 10:38 To: Fusebox Subject: RE: RE: Managing program flow

Surely the program flow is more apparent in FuseBox because the entire flow (and virtually nothing else) is defined in the FuseBox file. I like to be able to read index.cfm, and see at a glance how the app flows.

Of course, you can make index.cfm pretty hard to understand by shuffling the order of the FuseCations within your CFSWITCH, or you can choose an order which has some relation to the way that users will move through the app. Good names help too, of course. But I think that the FuseBox itself is the greates aid to readability, comprehensibility that FB coding has going for it.

Have fun, Lee.

-----Original Message----- From: Nat Papovich [mailto:nat@webthugs.com] Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2001 9:51 To: Fusebox Subject: RE: RE: Managing program flow

Hopefully I don't sound like a person who hasn't done too much non-FB CF worik, but why is the program flow more apparent in Fusebox? Is that because you have named your fuseactions step1, step2, step3, etc?

Using a session variables are a really great way to do it, you could also check cgi.query_string to make sure the user came from the previous fuseaction step.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it is intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists


Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)
RE: Managing program flow  07 May 2001   (62 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  07 May 2001   (65 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  07 May 2001   (56 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  07 May 2001   (60 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  07 May 2001   (64 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  07 May 2001   (61 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  07 May 2001   (67 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  07 May 2001   (53 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  07 May 2001   (52 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  06 May 2001   (58 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  06 May 2001   (67 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  06 May 2001   (61 v/ +0 r)
Re: Managing program flow  06 May 2001   (59 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  05 May 2001   (50 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  04 May 2001   (60 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  04 May 2001   (62 v/ +0 r)
RE: Managing program flow  04 May 2001   (58 v/ +0 r)
Re: Managing program flow  04 May 2001   (57 v/ +0 r)
Re: Managing program flow  03 May 2001   (55 v/ +0 r)
Re: Managing program flow  03 May 2001   (59 v/ +0 r)
Re: Managing program flow  03 May 2001   (72 v/ +0 r)
RE: RE: Managing program flow  03 May 2001   (53 v/ +0 r)
RE: RE: Managing program flow  03 May 2001   (36 v/ +0 r)
RE: RE: Managing program flow  03 May 2001   (54 v/ +0 r)
Re: Managing program flow  03 May 2001   (58 v/ +0 r)
 

Send a reply to the Fusebox list!
click to send a reply! NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)

Feedback: If this post was exceptionally helpful, please help by giving this post a positive review.

 

TallyList : copyright Ububik - 2000