>while pondering caching a while back i thought about caching data >as static xml files to avoid hitting the dB repeatedly for dB content which >changes rarely,

I'm considering doing something similar for the same reasons except i'm passing a WDDX packet in a hidden form field (a query object of 1000 records)

>I came to the conclusion that it would be better to cache a cfscript block >which generates the required data structure (query, array, structure etc.) >Then you call the cached file, get the data into the CF variable, and do >with it what you will...

Have you actually tried this? How did you find it performance wise?

Thanks

KOla -----Original Message----- From: Bert Dawson [mailto:bdawson@redbanner.com] Sent: 08 May 2001 11:32 To: Fusebox Subject: RE: XSLT with Fusebox and JSP and whatever else

My understanding of XSLT is limited to knowing what it stands for, so this may be way off... However, while pondering caching a while back i thought about caching data as static xml files to avoid hitting the dB repeatedly for dB content which changes rarely, but the performance did concern me. I came to the conclusion that it would be better to cache a cfscript block which generates the required data structure (query, array, structure etc.) Then you call the cached file, get the data into the CF variable, and do with it what you will...

Bert

> -----Original Message----- > From: Louis Zezeran > [mailto:louis.zezeran@studentmail.newcastle.edu.au] > Sent: 08 May 2001 11:27 > To: Fusebox > Subject: XSLT with Fusebox and JSP and whatever else > > > Our lecturer has been teaching us about XSLT combined with XML and it > looks very helpful for defining multiple content types (ie HTML, WML, > cHTML etc etc) however the data must be put into XML first. I > have been > thinking up some ideas and I am about to put pen to paper (or > fingers to > keys) on how else to accomplish the task of multiple content > types with > Fusebox without having to go through XSLT. My main problems with XSLT > are > > 1) Speed, it's got to be parsed exra times, but that's not my main > concern. > 2) If the data wasn't in XML before hand, why convert it into XML just > so it can be converted back into something else. > > If the data is already in XML then I can see how it could be very > useful. > > Has anyone use XSLT with or fusebox already? Your input would be > appreciated, cheers people! > > Louis > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists