KOla

-----Original Message----- From: Bert Dawson [mailto:bdawson@redbanner.com] Sent: 08 May 2001 12:13 To: Fusebox Subject: RE: XSLT with Fusebox and JSP and whatever else

I've tried it and it was fast, but not for keeping track of form stuff - more for caching stuff which is held in a dB but rarely changes. I'm not sure why you'd want to pass 1000 records around in a hidden form field - what is in the records?

Bert

> -----Original Message----- > From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:kola@alexandermark.com] > Sent: 08 May 2001 12:00 > To: Fusebox > Subject: RE: XSLT with Fusebox and JSP and whatever else > > > Hi Bert > > >while pondering caching a while back i thought about caching data > >as static xml files to avoid hitting the dB repeatedly for > dB content which > >changes rarely, > > I'm considering doing something similar for the same reasons > except i'm > passing a WDDX packet > in a hidden form field (a query object of 1000 records) > > >I came to the conclusion that it would be better to cache a > cfscript block > >which generates the required data structure (query, array, > structure etc.) > >Then you call the cached file, get the data into the CF > variable, and do > >with it what you will... > > Have you actually tried this? How did you find it performance wise? > > Thanks > > KOla > -----Original Message----- > From: Bert Dawson [mailto:bdawson@redbanner.com] > Sent: 08 May 2001 11:32 > To: Fusebox > Subject: RE: XSLT with Fusebox and JSP and whatever else > > > My understanding of XSLT is limited to knowing what it stands > for, so this > may be way off... > However, while pondering caching a while back i thought about > caching data > as static xml files to avoid hitting the dB repeatedly for dB > content which > changes rarely, but the performance did concern me. > I came to the conclusion that it would be better to cache a > cfscript block > which generates the required data structure (query, array, > structure etc.) > Then you call the cached file, get the data into the CF > variable, and do > with it what you will... > > Bert > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Louis Zezeran > > [mailto:louis.zezeran@studentmail.newcastle.edu.au] > > Sent: 08 May 2001 11:27 > > To: Fusebox > > Subject: XSLT with Fusebox and JSP and whatever else > > > > > > Our lecturer has been teaching us about XSLT combined with > XML and it > > looks very helpful for defining multiple content types (ie > HTML, WML, > > cHTML etc etc) however the data must be put into XML first. I > > have been > > thinking up some ideas and I am about to put pen to paper (or > > fingers to > > keys) on how else to accomplish the task of multiple content > > types with > > Fusebox without having to go through XSLT. My main problems > with XSLT > > are > > > > 1) Speed, it's got to be parsed exra times, but that's not my main > > concern. > > 2) If the data wasn't in XML before hand, why convert it > into XML just > > so it can be converted back into something else. > > > > If the data is already in XML then I can see how it could be very > > useful. > > > > Has anyone use XSLT with or fusebox already? Your input would be > > appreciated, cheers people! > > > > Louis > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists