TallyList : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis

Archive of:
Fusebox
Cold Fusion Fuse Box List

home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates

all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback

About CF Fusebox Methods :
product's home
product's list home

Archived TallyList / Fusebox:
Subject: Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions

Billy Cravens (8p/+0r) Posted: Friday 11 May 2001
This post: 74 views, +0 rating

A tiny little German car company runs their site on CF - www.bmwusa.com

Does that qualify as enterprise?

-- Billy Cravens HR Web Development, Sabre billy.cravens@sabre.com

Adam Reynolds wrote:

> Discuss... > > We are in the process of doing presentations on various technologies and I > really ripped into Oracle WebDB the other week and expect them to be > gunning for me. I'm doing a presentation on CF, including the new CF5 > features. > > In lunch today this came up, that CF was not suitable for Enterprise > Solutions (sheesh). > > I also want to emphasise speed of development during the presentation. > > So what I need is links, examples, papers, the lot. > > Best Regards, > > Adam Reynolds > ColdFusion Web Developer > ISMG Development, Unilever > London > > ( +44 20 7822 5450 (ext 5450) > m: +44 7973 386620 > * adam.reynolds@unilever.com > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)

Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	13 May 2001	(150 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(146 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(87 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(89 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(81 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(72 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(94 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(78 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(87 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(89 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(86 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(87 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(77 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(76 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(79 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(84 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(73 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001 (this post)	(74 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(79 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(86 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(81 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(77 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(83 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(75 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(77 v/ +0 r)

Send a reply to the Fusebox list!
	NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)