TallyList : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis

Archive of:
Fusebox
Cold Fusion Fuse Box List

home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates

all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback

About CF Fusebox Methods :
product's home
product's list home

Archived TallyList / Fusebox:
Subject: RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions

Bill King (7p/+0r) Posted: Friday 11 May 2001
This post: 73 views, +0 rating

Pentax recently converted their site from JSP to CF. I think they can vouch for the Enterprise worthiness. www.pentax.com

Signed,

Bill King HostWorks INC http://www.hostworks.com

-----Original Message----- From: stas [mailto:stas@newdel.net] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 7:56 AM To: Fusebox Subject: Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions

Examples of what? Apps? Check out onproject.com.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Reynolds" <Adam.Reynolds@unilever.com>

It's a very strange statement, as it is easy to say and difficult to demonstrate being false. What I need is examples. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)

Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	13 May 2001	(145 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(140 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(80 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(82 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(74 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(67 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(88 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(71 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(81 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(82 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(80 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(80 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(69 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(72 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001 (this post)	(73 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(79 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(64 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(66 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(74 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(80 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(72 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(72 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(78 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(69 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(73 v/ +0 r)

Send a reply to the Fusebox list!
	NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)