Tally List : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis
click for archive home
 
Archive of:
Fusebox
Cold Fusion Fuse Box List
 
home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates
 
all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback


Search the Tallylist search by keyword:

About CF Fusebox Methods :
product's home
product's list home
 
  Archived TallyList / Fusebox: 
Subject: RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions
Nat Papovich (80p/+0r)     Posted: Friday 11 May 2001
This post: 85 views, +0 rating

Autobytel.com runs dozens of webservers in a farm with millions of hits per day. They have had no problems and are actually converting their stuff to Fusebox.

ToysRus.com (now all part of amazon.com's backbone), which at one point was running over 100 webservers handling their traffic at xmas shopping season was another example. You cynics out there might say that toysrus.com went down a lot that season. I've heard from the lead programmer there (a one Mr. Medinets) that the reason they went down is because an Allaire Consultant came out to their site, checked out the application and recommended a certain number of CF servers to handle their expected load. Well along came the expected load and those servers died - too many hits. After getting a bunch of servers overnighted from Dell, toysrus.com was successful.

Finally, my own little piece of scalable news: I recently built a prom dress retail site (last fall) in Fusebox and CF. When I finished it, we were already getting 10,000 hits per day. A few months later (after ads appeared in seventeen magazine) I reviewed the WebTrends reports and we were averaging 500,000 hits per day on one dual-proc server. Peak days were 1 million plus hits. Site was always really fast. I recieved no errors for months from that site.

Therefore, CF and Fusebox are both enterprise worthy.

Check out http://fusebox.org/Files/presentations/Scalability.ppt for Doug Nottage's (lead tech dude at autobytel) presentation on scalability. It's very thorough.

NAT

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists


Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  13 May 2001   (150 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  12 May 2001   (146 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  12 May 2001   (87 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  12 May 2001   (89 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  12 May 2001   (81 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  12 May 2001   (72 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (94 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (79 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (88 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (90 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (86 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (88 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (78 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (77 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (79 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001 (this post)   (85 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (74 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (74 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (80 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (86 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (81 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (78 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (83 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (76 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (78 v/ +0 r)
 

Send a reply to the Fusebox list!
click to send a reply! NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)

Feedback: If this post was exceptionally helpful, please help by giving this post a positive review.

 

TallyList : copyright Ububik - 2000