TallyList : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis

Archive of:
Fusebox
Cold Fusion Fuse Box List

home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates

all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback

About CF Fusebox Methods :
product's home
product's list home

Archived TallyList / Fusebox:
Subject: RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions

Paul Smith (28p/+0r) Posted: Friday 11 May 2001
This post: 77 views, +0 rating

I thot I heard Doug say ONE dozen (12)

(I say this not to be critical but to insure our questioner doesn't mis-state a detail and blow his case.)

My favorite story about Toys-R-Us is that their server farm was in (I think, I'd have to look up my notes to be sure) 10 groups of 10 servers. Load balancing for all 100 servers was done by a CF app running running on server 101.

best, paul

At 01:09 PM 5/11/01 -0700, you wrote: >Autobytel.com runs dozens of webservers in a farm with millions of hits per >day. They have had no problems and are actually converting their stuff to >Fusebox

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)

Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	13 May 2001	(150 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(146 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(87 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(89 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(81 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	12 May 2001	(72 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(94 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(79 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(87 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(89 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(86 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(87 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(77 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001 (this post)	(77 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(79 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(84 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(73 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(74 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(79 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(86 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(81 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(77 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(83 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(75 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions	11 May 2001	(77 v/ +0 r)

Send a reply to the Fusebox list!
	NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)