Tally List : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis
click for archive home
 
Archive of:
Fusebox
Cold Fusion Fuse Box List
 
home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates
 
all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback


Search the Tallylist search by keyword:

About CF Fusebox Methods :
product's home
product's list home
 
  Archived TallyList / Fusebox: 
Subject: RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions
McCollough, Alan (150p/+0r)     Posted: Friday 11 May 2001
This post: 88 views, +0 rating

Now is this before or after their big debut flop, where their servers were totally overloaded?

> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen M Aylor [SMTP:iincorp@home.com] > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:47 PM > To: Fusebox > Subject: Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions > > And Shall we not forget the best CF site going - IMHO - Victoria's Secret > :-) > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nat Papovich" <nat@webthugs.com> > To: "Fusebox" <Fusebox@houseoffusion.com> > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:09 PM > Subject: RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions > > > > Autobytel.com runs dozens of webservers in a farm with millions of hits > per > > day. They have had no problems and are actually converting their stuff > to > > Fusebox. > > > > ToysRus.com (now all part of amazon.com's backbone), which at one point > was > > running over 100 webservers handling their traffic at xmas shopping > season > > was another example. You cynics out there might say that toysrus.com > went > > down a lot that season. I've heard from the lead programmer there (a one > Mr. > > Medinets) that the reason they went down is because an Allaire > Consultant > > came out to their site, checked out the application and recommended a > > certain number of CF servers to handle their expected load. Well along > came > > the expected load and those servers died - too many hits. After getting > a > > bunch of servers overnighted from Dell, toysrus.com was successful. > > > > Finally, my own little piece of scalable news: I recently built a prom > dress > > retail site (last fall) in Fusebox and CF. When I finished it, we were > > already getting 10,000 hits per day. A few months later (after ads > appeared > > in seventeen magazine) I reviewed the WebTrends reports and we were > > averaging 500,000 hits per day on one dual-proc server. Peak days were 1 > > million plus hits. Site was always really fast. I recieved no errors for > > months from that site. > > > > Therefore, CF and Fusebox are both enterprise worthy. > > > > Check out http://fusebox.org/Files/presentations/Scalability.ppt for > Doug > > Nottage's (lead tech dude at autobytel) presentation on scalability. > It's > > very thorough. > > > > NAT > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists


Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  13 May 2001   (150 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  12 May 2001   (146 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  12 May 2001   (87 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  12 May 2001   (89 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  12 May 2001   (81 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  12 May 2001   (72 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (94 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (79 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001 (this post)   (88 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (89 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (86 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (87 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (77 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (77 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (79 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (84 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (73 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (74 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (80 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (86 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (81 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (78 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (83 v/ +0 r)
RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (75 v/ +0 r)
Re: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions  11 May 2001   (77 v/ +0 r)
 

Send a reply to the Fusebox list!
click to send a reply! NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)

Feedback: If this post was exceptionally helpful, please help by giving this post a positive review.

 

TallyList : copyright Ububik - 2000