Tally List : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis
click for archive home
 
Archive of:
Analog-Help
Analog Web Log Analysis
 
home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates
 
all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback


Search the Tallylist search by keyword:

About Analog :
product's home
product's list home
 
  Archived TallyList / Analog-Help: 
Subject: robots, including, excluding, and so on
Dennis Nichols (6p/+0r)     Posted: Monday 29 Jan 2001
This post: 108 views, +0 rating

Greetings - First, my understanding of ROBOTINCLUDE and ROBOTEXCLUDE is that these are report-level commands, that is, they affect only the Operating System Report. Right?

A previous exchange on this list...

On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Stephen Turner wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Aaron Shoblaske wrote: >> In the 4.90beta, is there any way in one line to exclude from the entire >> report all robots that you've defined using robotinclude (eg. ROBOT none) >> or do you still have to type in a bunch of seperate BROWEXCLUDEs for each >> robot (eg. BROWEXCLUDE inktomi*, etc.)? And if there isn't would it be >> hard to implement it in the beta?

> There isn't. It's a good idea though. I'll do it. Probably.

The above is a good step but something about it seems odd - one says which browsers to include in the Operating System Report as being robots, and then one says exclude all such items from the entire report.

How about this instead/in addition:

For a selected set of commands, invent a syntax extension that says read the arguments for this command from a file. I could then, for example, put a list of robotish browsers in a file and use any of the following:

ROBOTINCLUDE -FILE filename ROBOTEXCLUDE -FILE filename BROWEXCLUDE -FILE filename BROWINCLUDE -FILE filename

This differs from CONFIGFILE because only the arguments would be in the file, not the commands. This could be generalized to many other commands but it is only really useful where you want to use the same list of arguments for different commands. I think only the item include/exclude commands would get used this way.

Does this make sense?

-- Dennis Nichols nichols@tradingconnections.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send mail to analog-help-REQUEST@lists.isite.net with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.


Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)
Re: robots, including, excluding, and so on  30 Jan 2001   (107 v/ +0 r)
Re: robots, including, excluding, and so on  30 Jan 2001   (68 v/ +0 r)
Re: robots, including, excluding, and so on  30 Jan 2001   (63 v/ +0 r)
Re: robots, including, excluding, and so on  30 Jan 2001   (66 v/ +0 r)
Re: robots, including, excluding, and so on  30 Jan 2001   (88 v/ +0 r)
robots, including, excluding, and so on  29 Jan 2001 (this post)   (108 v/ +0 r)
 

Send a reply to the Analog-Help list!
click to send a reply! NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)

Feedback: If this post was exceptionally helpful, please help by giving this post a positive review.

 

TallyList : copyright Ububik - 2000