TallyList : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis

Archive of:
Spectra-Talk
Cold Fusion Spectra - Technical

home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates

all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback

About Spectra :
product's home
product's list home

Archived TallyList / Spectra-Talk:
Subject: RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3

Alexandre Dornback (5p/+0r) Posted: Monday 02 Apr 2001
This post: 45 views, +0 rating

I'm getting an error when trying to re-create my user directories after a cf5.0 b3 upgrade. It toasted my old smpolicy database information and created the new smpolicy mdb. I therefore had to go into CFAdmin advanced security and create my security contexts from scratch. Then when I try to create the user directories, I get the following :

************************************

Error Diagnostic Information The encrypted template D:\INETPUB\WWWROOT\CFIDE\ADMINISTRATOR\SECURITY\USERDIRECTORYDETAIL.CFM contains invalid CFML syntax.

Because the template has been encrypted, you cannot see the actual error message. You need to have access to an unencrypted version of the template to get detailed error information

The specific sequence of files included or processed is: D:\INETPUB\WWWROOT\cfide\administrator\security\userdirectorydetail.cfm

************************************

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a message to spectra-talk-request@houseoffusion.com with 'unsubscribe' in the body.

Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)

RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	11 Apr 2001	(52 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	05 Apr 2001	(43 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	05 Apr 2001	(49 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	04 Apr 2001	(43 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	03 Apr 2001	(53 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	03 Apr 2001	(49 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	03 Apr 2001	(51 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	03 Apr 2001	(52 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	03 Apr 2001	(46 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	03 Apr 2001	(49 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	03 Apr 2001	(48 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	03 Apr 2001	(48 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001	(50 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001	(51 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001	(49 v/ +0 r)
Re: RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001	(49 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001	(49 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001	(46 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001	(45 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001 (this post)	(45 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001	(54 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001	(49 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001	(50 v/ +0 r)
RE: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001	(46 v/ +0 r)
Re: Spectra and cf 5.0 beta 3	02 Apr 2001	(116 v/ +0 r)

Send a reply to the Spectra-Talk list!
	NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)