Tally List : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis
click for archive home
 
Archive of:
Spectra-Talk
Cold Fusion Spectra - Technical
 
home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates
 
all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback


Search the Tallylist search by keyword:

About Spectra :
product's home
product's list home
 
  Archived TallyList / Spectra-Talk: 
Subject: Re: workflow speed
Lanny R. Udey (47p/+0r)     Posted: Wednesday 18 Apr 2001
This post: 24 views, +0 rating

Michiel,

I have to admit that we don't have any hard numbers on the difference for create and delete, although we did see a speed up. Certainly the major improvement was with finding tasks assigned to users as you would expect with the way Spectra does this.

Since this was the only problem we had with workflows I was just throwing this out as a possibility - for us 3 secs to create a workflow is not a big deal.

Lanny Udey Hofstra University

> boland@carmel.diva.nl Wednesday, April 18, 2001 >>>

> Again, I would ask how many total workflows you have. Having too many > is where we saw problems.

I fail to see how the number of workflows would affect performance. If it does then that would be a major design flaw. Or do you mean that it takes forever to do things like find out which tasks are assigned to a certain user? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a message to spectra-talk-request@houseoffusion.com with 'unsubscribe' in the body.


Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)
Re: workflow speed  19 Apr 2001   (23 v/ +0 r)
RE: workflow speed  19 Apr 2001   (25 v/ +0 r)
Re: workflow speed  19 Apr 2001   (28 v/ +0 r)
Re: workflow speed  18 Apr 2001 (this post)   (24 v/ +0 r)
Re: workflow speed  18 Apr 2001   (28 v/ +0 r)
Re: workflow speed  17 Apr 2001   (17 v/ +0 r)
Re: workflow speed  17 Apr 2001   (23 v/ +0 r)
Re: workflow speed  17 Apr 2001   (20 v/ +0 r)
workflow speed  17 Apr 2001   (26 v/ +0 r)
 

Send a reply to the Spectra-Talk list!
click to send a reply! NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)

Feedback: If this post was exceptionally helpful, please help by giving this post a positive review.

 

TallyList : copyright Ububik - 2000