> I am going to setup a Win2000 server today. It sounds like the NTFS is the > way to go if you are using IIS. Has anyone had experience switching to > this? It sounds pretty simple. That is why I am a little bit worried.
It is actually as simple as you have been lead to believe.
> Any advice for staying with FAT versus NTFS?
Not on 2000. There were a few good arguments for FAT partitions in NT but those have all been negated with 2000 since you can boot to a 2000 drive in console mode when you no longer have a working system and since 2000 doesn't need to be partitioned to be installed on larger drives.
NTFS has quite a few advantages, not the least of which are permissions and better use of larger (2 Gig+) drivers.
Benjamin S. Rogers Web Developer, c4.net Voice: (508) 240-0051 Fax: (508) 240-0057 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send a message to cf-server-request@houseoffusion.com with 'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com