TallyList : mailing list management, archiving, and analysis

Archive of:
CF-Server
Cold Fusion Server Tech

home
24 hour view
quick stats
weekly updates

all tallylists
corporate solutions
archive your favorite
help / feedback

About Cold Fusion :
product's home
product's list home

Archived TallyList / CF-Server:
Subject: Re: [RE: Performance analysis]

s@njeevi (9p/+0r) Posted: Friday 23 Feb 2001
This post: 44 views, +0 rating

Hi dave , thanks for the information. I was also under the wrong impression that the application.cfm is called for every script in the program and not just once for a request.

But here I have a doubt

I have a page where in I am using CFHTTP here the CFHTTP is a request right so in that case is the Application.cfm called again. I am using the CFHTTP to connect to mysite itself for some specific reason. Can I check with anybody if my understanding is correct in this.

thanks Sanjeevi

Dave Watts <dwatts@figleaf.com> wrote: > > the application.cfm, or cached template, is called for every > > template in the request. > > This isn't correct. Application.cfm is invoked once for each request, not > for each script used to respond to a single request. > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > voice: (202) 797-5496 > fax: (202) 797-5444 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send a message to cf-server-request@houseoffusion.com with 'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com

Similar Subject Line Posts (+/- two weeks of this post)

RE: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(31 v/ +0 r)
CF load take	08 Mar 2001	(36 v/ +0 r)
RE: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(36 v/ +0 r)
RE: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(32 v/ +0 r)
RE: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(40 v/ +0 r)
RE: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(34 v/ +0 r)
Re: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(37 v/ +0 r)
RE: NAICS	08 Mar 2001	(31 v/ +0 r)
url resolution using cfx_http - RegEx question	08 Mar 2001	(61 v/ +0 r)
RE: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(34 v/ +0 r)
RE: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(53 v/ +0 r)
RE: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(34 v/ +0 r)
RE: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(28 v/ +0 r)
RE: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(37 v/ +0 r)
RE: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(45 v/ +0 r)
RE: naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(25 v/ +0 r)
RE: NAICS	08 Mar 2001	(26 v/ +0 r)
naything wrong with heavy use of session vars?	08 Mar 2001	(40 v/ +0 r)
NAICS	07 Mar 2001	(25 v/ +0 r)
RE: http error 403	07 Mar 2001	(33 v/ +0 r)
http error 403	07 Mar 2001	(25 v/ +0 r)
Re: http error 403	07 Mar 2001	(28 v/ +0 r)
RE: max variable length	07 Mar 2001	(40 v/ +0 r)
Re: CF-Server-List V1 #94	06 Mar 2001	(37 v/ +0 r)
RE: max variable length	06 Mar 2001	(45 v/ +0 r)

Send a reply to the CF-Server list!
	NOTE: Many lists will reject your post unless you have already registered with them. Also - don't forget the right account to send from (for those with multiple emails!)